Dysprosium at $250, Terbium at $1,000: The New Pricing Reality

Dysprosium traded around US$250 per kilogram and terbium above US$1,000

per kilogram during 2025 — figures that would have seemed implausible

two years ago. Neodymium oxide held roughly US$73 per kilogram. The

rare-earth price complex has been reset, and the new floor is materially

higher than the pre-2024 norm.¹²

The Headline Prices

The USGS's 2026 Mineral Commodity Summaries records 2025 price averages

for rare-earth oxides in US$/kg (Argus Non-Ferrous Markets,

free-on-board): lanthanum oxide US$1.00, cerium oxide US$1.71,

praseodymium oxide US$74, neodymium oxide US$73, neodymium-praseodymium

oxide US$69, samarium oxide US$2.82, europium oxide US$27 and gadolinium

oxide US$30.¹

The headline heavy rare earths sit outside the USGS standard table but

in line with coverage from Reuters and specialist rare-earth press.

Dysprosium traded at roughly US$250 per kilogram through 2025, while

terbium moved above US$1,000 per kilogram during the tightest months.²

These are the two elements whose supply was most directly disrupted by

China's April 2025 export controls, and they carry the largest premium

to any pre-2024 reference.

Several oxides also showed interesting intra-year dynamics. Cerium oxide

rose from US$1.21 per kilogram in 2024 to US$1.71 in 2025, a 41 percent

jump in a historically stable element where demand is dominated by

catalysts and polishing. That move suggests that the 2025 price strength

was not confined to magnet rare earths but spread across the broader

basket, partly as a knock-on from the supply-chain disruption.

The Geographic Price Split

A second feature of the 2025 price environment was the widening gap

between Chinese and non-Chinese rare-earth markets. Reuters-aligned

reporting found that buyers of permanent magnets produced outside China

were paying US$10-30 per kilogram more than equivalent Chinese-sourced

material, and European spot prices for some heavy rare earths reached up

to six times the levels seen in China during the tightest months.²

The split is the clearest possible signal of a segmented market. In a

fully liquid global rare-earth market, regional price differences of

that magnitude would be arbitraged away within days by physical movement

of material. That arbitrage did not happen in 2025 because the Chinese

licensing system effectively stopped it — exporters needed case-by-case

approval, non-Chinese buyers had limited alternative sources, and the

supply-chain disruption translated directly into price dispersion.

What's Behind the Move

Three drivers combined to produce the 2025 price environment. The first

was the April 2025 Chinese export-control package, which targeted

samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and

yttrium, along with related alloys, compounds, metals and oxides.¹ The

second was the October 2025 expansion, which added holmium, erbium,

thulium, europium and ytterbium — and included processing equipment and

technologies.¹

The third was structural demand. Permanent-magnet consumption for

electric vehicles and wind turbines has been growing by double-digit

percentages annually since the early 2020s, and magnet rare earths

(neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, terbium) are exactly the fraction

that the industry needs most. The combination of policy-driven supply

constraints and demand growth produced a classic tight-market pricing

response, with the elements most exposed to both forces moving the most.

A fourth factor deserves separate mention: inventory behaviour. Through

the first half of 2025, buyers ran down existing stocks on the

assumption that the supply disruption would be temporary. When the

October expansion made that assumption look naive, procurement teams

globally shifted to building strategic inventory — and the resulting

simultaneous buying wave in the second half of the year amplified the

price move beyond what the underlying supply-demand fundamentals alone

would have implied.

The Adamas Projection

Adamas Intelligence, the specialist consultancy whose open research has

long focused on rare-earth magnet markets, projects that global

undersupply of dysprosium and terbium oxides will rise to 1,800 and 450

tonnes per year respectively by 2040 — amounts roughly equal to current

annual global production of each oxide.³ Put differently: the world's

current heavy-rare-earth production is approximately half of what the

permanent-magnet industry will need by 2040 on Adamas's base-case demand

scenario.

Unless substantial new supply comes online — from Lynas in Malaysia,

from Brazilian ionic-clay projects, from U.S. initiatives like MP

Materials and ReElement, from Australian expansions, or from recycling —

the price pressure visible in 2025 is unlikely to ease structurally. The

2025 price environment may turn out to be an early reading of what the

2030s normal looks like.

What It Means for Producers

For producers already in commercial operation, the 2025 price

environment has been a windfall. Serra Verde's mixed concentrate sold

into international markets at prices significantly above the assumptions

that underpinned the project's original feasibility study, and the

company's ability to ramp toward 6,500 tonnes per year by end-2027 has

been made materially easier by the improved revenue per tonne.

For producers in development, the pricing signal accelerates decisions.

Aclara's push through Carina permitting and Meteoric's progression of

Caldeira both benefit from a higher forward-price curve, which improves

project IRRs and makes capital-raising easier. For Western refining and

magnet-manufacturing capacity — MP Materials, Neo Performance Materials,

ReElement, the Viridis-Ionic hub in Poços de Caldas — the economics

similarly improve.

For large consumers, the opposite is true. Automakers, wind-turbine

manufacturers and electronics producers face structurally higher input

costs for rare-earth components. The engineering response has included

higher-intensity magnet designs, partial substitution toward

lower-rare-earth-content motor configurations, and investment in

rare-earth-free motor technology — but none of these fully eliminate

exposure to the pricing of magnet rare earths.

Automakers in particular have had to adjust supply-chain contracts and

inventory policies. Several major European and Japanese OEMs moved to

multi-year offtake agreements with non-Chinese producers during 2025,

absorbing higher per-kilogram prices in return for guaranteed supply.

Those contract changes lock in a portion of the 2025 price environment

into the next several years, even if spot prices moderate.

Outlook

The 2026 price picture will be shaped by the interaction of Chinese

policy, non-Chinese supply growth, and permanent-magnet demand. The most

plausible scenario is that dysprosium stays above US$150 per kilogram,

terbium above US$600, and neodymium-praseodymium oxide in the US$60-80

range — figures materially above the 2020-202

Related:
All rare earth articles | Brazil Critical Minerals | Brazil Mining Journal