Recycling the Magnet: What Could Make or Break the Next Decade

The electric vehicles, wind turbines and consumer electronics produced

in the last 15 years contain millions of tonnes of permanent magnets now

approaching end of life. How the world recycles that stock will

determine a meaningful share of rare-earth supply through the 2030s —

and it will shape whether the supply-demand gap that Adamas Intelligence

projects actually materialises.¹

The End-of-Life Opportunity

Permanent-magnet demand has grown at compound double-digit percentages

since the early 2010s. That growth has produced a large installed base

of magnets embedded in vehicles, turbines and industrial equipment. A

typical electric vehicle carries 2-5 kilogrammes of magnets; a modern

direct-drive wind turbine generator can hold several hundred kilogrammes

per megawatt.¹ As the oldest of these installations approach end of

life, they become feedstock for recycling — if the recycling

infrastructure exists to process them.

The scale of the end-of-life stock is meaningful. Industry estimates

suggest that globally recoverable rare-earth content in decommissioned

EVs, wind turbines, consumer electronics, hard-disk drives and

industrial motors could reach 5,000-8,000 tonnes per year by the early

2030s — a material contribution to global supply at a moment when

primary supply is structurally tight.

How Magnet Recycling Works

Recycling neodymium-iron-boron magnets involves a series of process

steps that differ meaningfully from primary-ore processing. End-of-life

magnets are first recovered from the parent product, typically through

mechanical dismantling or shredding. The recovered magnets are then

demagnetised, crushed and processed through one of several chemical

pathways: hydrometallurgical leaching to dissolve rare earths and

separate them from iron and boron, pyrometallurgical routes using

molten-salt electrolysis, or direct recycling approaches that re-sinter

the recovered magnet material with minimal chemical intervention.

Each pathway has trade-offs. Hydrometallurgy produces high-purity

separated rare-earth oxides but requires substantial chemical inputs.

Pyrometallurgy is energy-intensive but chemically cleaner. Direct

recycling is fastest and least resource-intensive but yields material

that can only substitute for lower-grade magnet applications rather than

automotive- or defence-grade products.

Commercial magnet recycling is not yet operating at the scale that

end-of-life feedstock growth implies. Several pilot operations run in

Europe, Japan and North America, but none has yet demonstrated economics

competitive with primary production for magnet-grade output. The gap is

closing, however, as rare-earth prices rise and as engineering

optimisation of recycling circuits proceeds.

Viridis-Ionic at Poços de Caldas

The Brazilian rare-earth industry is building explicit recycling

capability alongside its new primary-production capacity. The joint

venture between Viridis Mining and Minerals and the UK-listed Ionic Rare

Earths at Poços de Caldas is designed from the outset to integrate

magnet recycling with ionic-clay concentrate processing.²

Ionic Rare Earths' proprietary recycling technology is the basis for the

recycling dimension of the Poços de Caldas hub. The company has

developed a hydrometallurgical approach tailored to magnet feedstock

that aims to produce separated rare-earth oxides at competitive cost.

Combined with the primary-concentrate separation capacity planned at the

same facility, the two streams can share infrastructure — chemical

plant, utilities, workforce, analytical capability — in ways that

standalone recycling facilities cannot.

The strategic logic is compelling. As end-of-life magnet volumes grow

globally, a Brazilian facility with recycling capability positioned to

serve Western customers sits at the intersection of two increasingly

valuable capabilities: non-Chinese separation and non-primary supply.

The commercial model can flex between primary concentrate processing

(when ionic-clay feed is abundant) and recycling (when magnet feedstock

becomes available), making throughput more predictable.

The Economics — Why It Matters Now

Adamas Intelligence's open research projects substantial undersupply of

magnet rare earths through the coming decades. Global undersupply of

dysprosium and terbium oxides is forecast to rise to 1,800 tonnes and

450 tonnes per year respectively by 2040 — amounts roughly equal to

current annual production of each oxide — and approximately US$7.3

billion of magnet rare-earth-oxide demand will go unmet by 2040 unless

new supply grows materially beyond current base-case expectations.¹

Those figures assume that primary supply grows at roughly the pace

currently projected. If recycling can add 5,000-8,000 tonnes per year to

supply by the early 2030s — and if a meaningful share of that total

carries heavy-rare-earth content — the deficit narrows. The arithmetic

makes recycling not an environmental nice-to-have but a material

component of the solution to the projected shortfall.

The price environment reinforces the economics. Dysprosium at roughly

US$250 per kilogram and terbium above US$1,000 per kilogram in 2025

raise the revenue per tonne recovered from recycled magnets

substantially above the levels that defined 2020-2023.³ Projects that

were marginal three years ago are now clearly economic.

What Could Hold It Back

Three factors could limit the recycling contribution. First, collection

logistics remain fragmented. Magnets in end-of-life vehicles, turbines

and electronics are not easy to separate, and the reverse-supply-chain

infrastructure required to route them to recycling facilities is

underdeveloped. In Europe, regulatory frameworks under the EU Battery

and End-of-Life Vehicle Directives are being updated to address this,

but implementation is uneven.

Second, quality control matters. Magnet feedstock varies widely in

composition, coating and condition, and processing economics depend on

sorting and pre-treatment to deliver consistent input. Recyclers that

can handle heterogeneous feedstock reliably will have a meaningful

advantage over those that can only process specific magnet grades.

Third, competition from primary supply could push recycling economics

sideways if new primary producers scale faster than anticipated.

Brazilian ionic-clay projects, Australian expansions, and U.S. MP

Materials 10X all add primary capacity over 2026-2030. If primary supply

growth exceeds demand growth, rare-earth prices could soften — and

recycling economics could tighten with them.

Outlook

Recycling the magnet is one of the strategic optionalities in the global

rare-earth picture. If it scales as technology and policy currently

suggest it can, it adds a meaningful supplementary supply that smooths

the price trajectory and reinforces the diversification away from

Chinese dominance. If it lags, the Adamas shortfall scenarios become

more likely and rare-ea

Related:
All rare earth articles | Brazil Critical Minerals | Brazil Mining Journal